Sunday, October 11, 2026

The Demon of Unrest by Erik Larson

I'll read anything Erik Larson writes. He has a brilliant way of weaving his inexhaustible research into a compelling story. So when I saw he had a new book out, The Demon of Unrest, it went immediately onto my reading list. 

I'm a big fan of the history of the Civil War (and actually all of American history), so I was fascinated by how Larson could take a well-known tidbit of the Civil War -- the firing on Fort Sumter -- and turn it into a full-fledged story. Of course he accomplished this; he's Erik Larson.

He weaves a tale by focusing on a few key players. He begins with Major Robert Anderson, Sumter’s commander and a former slave owner sympathetic to the South but loyal to the Union, contrasting him with Edmund Ruffin, a vain and bloodthirsty radical who stirs secessionist ardor at every opportunity. He includes the delightful and catty Mary Boykin Chesnut, whose diary provides a fascinating peek into antebellum high culture. Woven throughout is newly elected President Abraham Lincoln, battling with the forces of time and awful communication. In addition, his frenemy and Secretary of State, William Seward, complicates matters at every turn. 

While we know that Fort Sumter will be fired upon by South Carolina, Larson has a fascinating way of making the inevitable less so. By giving us a window into the challenges Major Anderson faced, we can see how the march of time and the lack of clear communication pushed the nation inexorably towards Civil War. The timing was the worst it could be. Lincoln had been elected and that threw South Carolina into what it saw as a desperate fight for survival. But, Lincoln would not become president for another four months. That left the weak and indecisive Buchanan at the helm during these most critical days. The South thought Buchanan sympathetic to their cause and so believed succession would be a simple matter, like an amicable divorce. Just clean up a few house-keeping details and move on to separate lives. Buchanan did not actually see it that way, but decided to kick the can down the road to his successor. 

Meanwhile, Lincoln was chomping at the bit to exercise power he did not yet have. He saw clearly that the South must not be allow to leave the Union. At a minimum, federal properties must be protected and reinforced. In frustration, he watched Buchanan dicker and let the all-important forts in the South Carolina harbor be taken over and reinforced by the Confederacy.

This uncertainty and lack of clear direction forced Major Anderson's hand. Finding the still-under-construction Fort Sumter to be the most defensible property, he evacuated all the federal forces to it. While the surrounding military installations constructed batteries aimed exclusively at Sumter, Anderson was running low on provisions and materiel. Although the South was allowed by Buchanan to pour men and resources into their stolen forts, any act of reinforcement by Anderson was seen as an act of war. 

Lincoln faced an increasingly untenable situation. Sumter needed reinforcements, but that very act would drive more states into the Confederacy and very likely start a war. Realizing that he had no choice -- Sumter must be either surrendered or reinforced -- Lincoln approved a misguided and poorly planned mission to provide food and sneak in soldiers to the embattled location. The weather, hubris of the officers in charge, Southern batteries, and miscommunication conspired to assure the planned resupply never happened. 

Sumter fought valiantly, but once it became ablaze, all hope was lost. 

Adding insult to injury, Anderson demanded a 100-gun salute to the bravery of the defenders. Miraculously, not one person at Sumter had died in the battle. And yet, one of the cannons exploded during the salute killing one soldier. After the man was properly buried at sea, Anderson ordered the salute to continue, but limited it to 50. What a perfect picture of all that had gone wrong. So many, thinking they were doing the "honorable" thing, led to such eventual bloodshed. 

Larson does a great job of telling "the rest of the story." He contrasts the "chivalry" (upper echelons of Southern society) and their elation at the start of the war to their eventual downfall. The Chesnuts lose everything; Ruffin shoots himself when he sees that his dream had turned into a nightmare. And the reader knows the horrifying destruction wrought by Americans killing other Americans. 

Larson ends with a chilling anecdote: Anderson is invited back to Sumter for a celebration at the war's end. The fort itself is in terrible shape, having been battered by Union forces over the course of the war. Anderson is a shell of his former self, never having recovered from the stress he faced in those months of uncertainty. At a dinner celebrating the victory, Anderson offers a toast to Lincoln and contrasts Lincoln ascension to the White House, under threat to assassination, to Lincoln's apparent security in a reunified nation. He had no idea that Lincoln lay dying at that very moment. 

So much tragedy. So much possibility of a different outcome, and yet so much seems inevitable: all the elements of a great story. 

Friday, September 4, 2026

Surprised by Joy by C.S. Lewis

I'm slowly making my way through every C.S. Lewis book. So of course I had to read Surprised by Joy. It's a book about his early life, that Lewis felt compelled to write by so many people simply wanting to know.

I can't say I loved it. 

I feel like I know most of the stories already. Maybe from a movie or other books? 

I also felt way out of my league intellectually. He discusses the different philosophers and ideas he wrestled with over the years, and he lost me every time. 

I loved his framing, however. 

He discusses moments, early in his life, when he felt what he calls "joy." It's an extreme longing for something just out of reach and it produces a sublimity he continues to chase. Unfortunately, he can never quite figure out what, exactly, causes those fleeting moments. 

At the same time, he details his faith in God, such as it was. He begins with an immature faith in a God who should do what he wants him to do (heal Lewis' mother). He then moves into materialism and denies there is a God. Yet he remains drawn to mysticism. Finally the contradiction is too much for his brilliant mind to handle. 

Inexorably, almost against his will, he is forced to admit that the God he rejected is the God he's been searching for his whole life. He can't even remember the exact moment of surrender except to say that when he started driving down the road he was not a Christian and when he arrived he was. 

In the end, he abandons his pursuit of joy. It's not so much that God become that source of joy as much as he just didn't need the glimpses anymore. 

Because his conversion is so unsatisfying -- it just kinda happened -- the book is as disappointing as he promised it would be in the beginning.

I like how he wrestled with ideas, even if I am unfamiliar with them in their entirety. The conflict between his delight in imagination and his rational mind makes sense to me. His discovery that only God, through Jesus Christ, squares this circle is delightful. I like that part.

*note bene - I did NOT like his stories of boarding school. Claude probably thinks there is something wrong with me because of all the questions I was asking. I wish those images were not in my mind...

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury

Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury is one of those books I just assumed everyone has read. Except me. Well it seems like a lot of people have read it. But... I was surprised at the reaction I got when I asked people about it.

I figured it was universally beloved, like 1984 or Brave New World. But it's not. At least in my small sample. 

Personally, I was underwhelmed. I know the basic story: firemen who start fires to rid the world of books. 

But that was really it. We meet Guy Montag already in a bit of an existential crisis. He knows he's supposed to burn up book and the house (and maybe even the people) surrounding them, but he's not sure why. 

Eventually he, without thinking about it at all, grabs and hides one of the books he is supposed to burn. Upon reading it, he realizes that books are good and should not be burned.

His boss is immediately suspicious of him and so Montag spends most of the book alternately becoming enlightened and hiding it. At the same time, he also wants to convince others to appreciate books. So... not so good at hiding it. 

He fails to convince others and is eventually on the run for his life. He escapes to an off-the-grid community of fellow book lovers. 

The end. 

What's missing is any kind of fleshed out story. Why is Montag even questioning all he knows? How did the society get the way it was in the first place? Honestly, it's something I could see happening today, but this book was written in the 50s. He envisions a world in which everyone is completely enthralled by screens! No personal connections. No real life. Just what is on the screen. But how did books become the enemy? It's like 1984 and Brave New World had a baby and it makes little sense. Totalitarianism AND "amusing ourselves to death." Why bother banning books that no one reads or wants to read? What was the thing that caused the world to change the job description of firemen? 

I guess if you want to read a book about the importance of books and why they should be appreciated, you could use this one, in a didactic sort of way. But I don't think it really makes the case.

The only interesting part is at the end, when they kill an innocent man and tell the world they got Montag. That's something I could see happening!

Saturday, August 1, 2026

So Brave, Young, and Handsome by Lief Enger

Enger is rapidly becoming a favorite author of mine. He is an amazing storyteller. 
(From https://groveatlantic.com/book/so-brave-young-and-handsome/) 
So Brave, Young, and Handsome by Lief Enger is...a touching, nimble, and rugged story of an aging train robber on a quest to reconcile the claims of love and judgment on his life, and the failed writer who goes with him.
In 1915 Minnesota, Monte Becket—“a man fading, a disappointer of persons”—has lost his sense of purpose. His only success long behind him, Monte lives a simple life with his loving wife and whipsmart son. But when he befriends outlaw Glendon Hale, a new world of opportunity and experience presents itself.
Glendon has spent years in obscurity, but the guilt he harbors for abandoning his wife, Blue, over two decades ago, has finally lured him from hiding. As the modern age marches swiftly forward, Glendon aims to travel back into his past—heading to California to seek Blue’s forgiveness. Beguiled and inspired, Monte soon finds himself leaving behind his own family to embark for the unruly West with his fugitive guide—a journey that will test the depth of his loyalties, the inviolability of his morals, and the strength of his resolve. As they flee from the relentless Charles Siringo, an ex-Pinkerton who’s been hunting Glendon for years, Monte falls ever further from his family and the law, to be tempered by a fiery adventure from which he may never get home.
With its smooth mix of romanticism and gritty reality, So Brave, Young, and Handsome often recalls the Old West’s greatest cowboy stories. But it is also about an ordinary man’s determination as he risks everything in order to understand what it’s all worth, and follows an unlikely dream in the hope it will lead him back home.
From me: Enger has an amazing way of taking you along for the ride. His characters are so well drawn that you can't help but feel that you know these people, or at least that you want to know them. He has an almost innate sense of justice for his characters that permeates his novels. 

Saturday, July 25, 2026

Murder in the Cathedral by T.S. Eliot

Murder in the Cathedral by T.S. Eliot is on my list of books to read "before I die." Plus I really like what little I've read of Eliot (Prufrock, Wasteland). 

But... I did not love this book. 

I thought I would. I'm familiar with the story he is dramatizing and I love it.

But it was just too... esoteric.

It's a play, which I didn't know. It has a chorus, which is odd. It's written in verse, which is tough. It assumes a lot!

So I read it. I can check it off. I'm not recommending it.

Friday, July 24, 2026

Copperhead by Bernard Cornwell

 This book, Copperhead by Bernard Cornwell, is the second in the Nathaniel Starbuck Chronicles, telling the story of the son of an abolitionist preacher who decides to fight for the South in the Civil War.

Starbuck is forced out of his beloved Falconer unit by the head of the unit itself, Washington Falconer. After murdering Falconer's future son-in-law for his treatment of Starbuck's love interest, Falconer banishes him.

Neither fish nor fowl, Starbuck has nowhere to go. Meanwhile his best friend, Falconer's son Adam, has decided to spy for the Union. Starbuck, himself, is caught and interrogated as the spy. After realizing that both Adam and Starbuck's brother James are implicated, he must walk a tight line to secure his freedom and the good graces of the South while avoiding betraying those he cares about. 

While seeming to "defect" to the North, he plays the role of double-agent for the ruthless Lieutenant de'Ath. But just as Starbuck returns to the South to betray the North, he learns of de'Ath's death. Who will protect him now?

He blackmails Adam saying he will reveal his duplicity to his father if Adam cannot secure a spot for Starbuck back with the Falconer Legion. Adam concedes, but appears to lose his mind in the end. 

We end our story with Starbuck back where he belongs. 

Saturday, July 11, 2026

Crazy Love by Francis Chan

I actually found a copy of Crazy Love by Francis Chan at one of the little neighborhood libraries around. I'm so glad I did. It's one of those, "I really need to read that book someday" kind of book. That day finally arrived!

I've loved Francis Chan for a long time, ever since watching this video. (see 13:01 "If Jesus had a church in Simi Valley, mine would be bigger.") He's like an Old Testament prophet calling us to repentance. Calling the church to repentance. He has amazing insight and he put his money where his mouth is; he gave up his church and rearranged his life to live much more intentionally as a follower of Christ. 

His book definitely challenged me. 

The title and the arrows indicate that God has a crazy love for us, and that that should foster a crazy love for Him from us. He starts off telling the church the ways in which we might be doing it wrong. We seem to have missed the essential picture of who God is as we go about our "normal" Christian lives. 

But it's the fourth chapter, "Profile of the Lukewarm" that really stopped me in my tracks. He states, 

LUKEWARM PEOPLE do not live by faith; their lives are structured so they never have to. They don't have to trust God if something unexpected happens —they have their savings account. They don't need God to help them — they have their retirement plan in place. They don't genuinely seek out what life God would have them live — they have life figured and mapped out. They don't depend on God on a daily basis— their refrigerators are full and, for the most part, they are in good health. The truth is, their lives wouldn't look much different if they suddenly stopped believing in God. (p. 79)

He makes it very clear that lukewarm people are not Christians. Wow! What a claim. But he defends it well. He cites Revelation 3:16, saying that God literally wants to vomit when it comes to the lukewarm. Chan also warns us against assuming we are the good soil in the parable of the sower, or even thinking that the rocky soil is not that bad. Chan says Jesus has called us to "pick up [our] cross" and His version of Christianity is not for the faint of heart. People who are not marked by the fruit of the Spirit, are not Christians; they are deceived. 

He then moves onto the devastating 1 John 2:3-4: "We know that we have come to know him if we obey his commands. The man who says, 'I know him,' but does not do what he commands is a liar, and the truth is not in him." Holy cow! How many of us claim the title of "Christian," but commit frivolous sins thinking, "It's no big deal." If so, we make Christ's death by torture "no big deal." Obviously I must turn the mirror on myself here, but I couldn't help thinking of my students. So many of them cheat and it's no big deal to them. They make zero connection between professing Christ and using AI to write a paper. But Scripture says that student "is a liar, and the truth is not in him." He is NOT a Christian! Another bold and frightening claim. Ouch!

Finally, Chan reminds us that 

21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22 Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’ (Matt. 7:21-23)

Who is this talking to if not those who call themselves Christians, but are not?!?  I definitely want to address all of this when I talk to my students about cheating. I think they will be shocked. 

Chan then describes the ways in which genuine Christians live: they are "obsessed." This means, they "love those who hate them and who can never love them back." (p. 130) They "care more about God's kingdom coming to this earth than their own lives being shielded from pain or distress." (p. 131) They "live lives that connect them with the poor in some way or another" believing it was "really important to" Jesus. (p. 133 They "will do things that don't always make sense in therms of success or wealth on this earth." (p. 134) They "know that you can never be humble enough." (p. 136) They "take joy in loving God by loving His people." (p. 136) They "genuinely think that others matter as much as they do." (p. 1328) They "orient their lives around eternity." (p. 139) They are "characterized by committed, settled, passionate love for God, and above and before every other thing and every other being." (p. 140) They "do not attempt to mask the ugliness of their sins or their failures." (p. 141 They "are nourished by God's Word throughout the day." (p. 142 They "know that true joy doesn't depend on circumstances or environment; it is a gift that must be chosen and cultivated, a gift that ultimately comes from God." (p. 143) The revel "in [their] role as child and friend of God." (p. 144)

He finishes up with stories of saints living the committed life. He asks us to pray and seek discernment for what exactly God is asking of us (not necessarily "calling"). Then we must respond or it's all for naught. He gives an update of the ways he is personally living this out. (He left his megachurch to become a missionary to the outcasts of San Francisco.) 

Finally, he discusses some resources he is developing to help Christians fulfill the Great Commission and make disciples: multiplymovement.com. I'll have to check it out! This is exciting, but sobering.